Seeking fitspiration on social media?

Now that it’s 2024, perhaps you’ve thought about taking up a new exercise program, eating better, or some other ways to improve your health. That’s great! Or, as my grandfather would say, “there’s nothing wrong with that” — his highest possible praise.

In fact, few medical treatments rival the massive health benefits of regular exercise. But how do you decide which type of exercise is best for you? Well, you could get advice from your doctor or a personal trainer. You might read books on fitness or sample exercise classes. It turns out, though, that many people are simply scrolling through tons of engaging “fitspirational” posts on social media. If you do that regularly — more often, say, than taking a brisk walk — a new study suggests you should rethink that strategy.

What exactly is fitspiration?

Fitspiration describes social media posts intended to inspire physical fitness and promote health. You can find fitspirational posts on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and other popular social media sites. Typically, they feature glossy photos and videos packaged with exercise and diet recommendations, accompanied by encouraging messages and quotes.

On Instagram alone, a search for #fitspiration (or related hashtags such as #fitspo) currently lists nearly 100 million posts. Most of them display images of attractive, lean, and fit women as they exercise and talk about fitness and optimizing health.

What’s the problem with fitspiration?

The potential benefits of a pro-fitness message reaching millions of people are obvious. But the message has to be credible and valid. And, importantly, posts should not convey inaccurate, unhelpful, or even harmful information. That’s where the problems start.

Clearly, social media posts about fitness can have positive effects, according to some research, especially when focused on realistic exercise goals rather than appearance. However, fitspirational posts may have downsides for viewers, including

• increased body dissatisfaction
• negative mood
• decreased perception of attractiveness
• embracing thinness as the ideal
• a limited range of diverse body shapes and types, suggesting that beauty is defined by being ultra-fit and thin
• a focus on appearance rather than function and capability.

A study of #fitspiration: Do these social media posts actually inspire fitness?

A recent study assesses the quality of content with fitspiration hashtags posted by Instagram influencers. The results were disappointing, though not surprising.

The authors identified 100 Instagram accounts of the most popular fitspiration influencers. Each of these accounts’ last 15 posts was analyzed. Posts were not considered credible if they

• displayed nudity or revealing clothing, such as wearing a bikini at the gym
• sexualized the person exercising, such as focusing on a woman’s breasts
• included images of extreme body types, such as people who are severely underweight or extremely muscular
• conveyed messages encouraging thinness or other negative messages rather than emphasizing health
• contained fitness information in three or fewer posts out of 15.

Here’s what the researchers found:

• 26% portrayed sexualized images
• 22% posted nudity or images of people exercising in revealing clothing not appropriate for exercise
• 15% featured people with extreme body types
• 41% posted fitness-related content in three or fewer posts.

A quarter of these accounts failed the credibility test on more than one of these criteria. Even among the accounts considered credible, only half were posted by people with credentials related to fitness or health, such as certification as a physical therapist or personal trainer.

While this study did not examine whether the posts had an actual impact on fitness outcomes, the findings raise questions about the quality of fitspiration content.

What does this mean for you?

If you’re looking for fitness-related health content, seek out the best information you can. Be skeptical of any sources lacking credentials related to fitness. Be especially wary of posts selling a product or service.

The authors of this study established certain criteria for fitness-related content they reviewed. You could apply this to posts you see online.

The bottom line

It should be no surprise to find that when it comes to health information, social media may not always be the best place to start.

While taking steps to improve your health is commendable — truly, there’s nothing wrong with that! — getting motivated to be more physically active is just a start. Information you rely on to improve your physical fitness shouldn’t just look appealing. It should be well-vetted for safety and backed by solid evidence that it can actually improve your health.

Here’s to better fitness in the New Year!

About the Author

Robert H. Shmerling, MD, Senior Faculty Editor, Harvard Health Publishing; Editorial Advisory Board Member, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Robert H. Shmerling is the former clinical chief of the division of rheumatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), and is a current member of the corresponding faculty in medicine at Harvard Medical School. … See Full Bio View all posts by Robert H. Shmerling, MD

New guidelines aim to screen millions more for lung cancer

Lung cancer kills more Americans than any other malignancy. The latest American Cancer Society (ACS) updated guidelines aim to reduce deaths by considerably expanding the pool of people who seek annual, low-dose CT lung screening scans.

Advocates hope the new advice will prompt more people at risk for lung cancer to schedule yearly screening, says Dr. Carey Thomson, director of the Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology and Lung Cancer Screening Program at Harvard-affiliated Mount Auburn Hospital, and chair of the Early Detection Task Group for the ACS/National Lung Cancer Roundtable. Currently, fewer than one in 10 eligible people in the US follow through on recommended lung screenings.

What are the major changes in the new ACS lung cancer guidelines?

The updated ACS guidelines are aimed at high-risk individuals, all of whom have a smoking history. And unlike previous ACS recommendations, it doesn’t matter how long ago a person quit smoking. The updated guidelines also lower the bar on amount of smoking and widen the age window to seek screening, which aligns with 2021 recommendations issued by the US Preventive Services Task Force.

These changes combined may mean another six to eight million people will be eligible to have screening.

How many people get lung cancer?

Although lung cancer is the third most common malignancy in the United States, it’s the deadliest, killing more people than colorectal, breast, prostate, and cervical cancers combined. In 2023, about 238,000 Americans will be diagnosed with lung cancer and 127,000 will die of it, according to ACS estimates.

What is the major risk factor for lung cancer?

While people who have never smoked can get lung cancer, smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke is a major risk factor for this illness. Smoking is linked to as many as 80% to 90% of lung cancer deaths, according to the CDC.

Indeed, people who smoke are 15 to 30 times more likely to develop or die from lung cancer than those who don’t. The longer someone smokes and the more cigarettes they smoke each day, the higher their risks.

Is lung cancer easier to treat if found in early stages?

Yes. As with many cancers, detecting lung malignancies in their earliest stages is pivotal to improving survival.

Depending on the type of lung cancer diagnosed, up to 80% to 90% of people with a single, early-stage tumor that can be removed surgically can survive five years or longer, says the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The number of people who survive long-term becomes smaller as tumors grow larger, and if they spread to lymph nodes or other areas of the body.

Should you consider lung CT screening?

The updated ACS guidelines recommend screening if you:

• Are 50 to 80 years old. This age range is expanded from the prior ACS recommended cutoff of 55 to 74.
• Are a current or previous smoker. This includes anyone who smoked, not just smokers who quit within the past 15 years.
• Smoked 20 or more pack-years. This means smoking an average of 20 cigarettes per day for 20 years or 40 cigarettes per day for 10 years. Previously, the eligibility cutoff was 30 or more pack-years.

“While an expansion in the number of people screened for lung cancer will find additional early tumors, it also means more false positives will be detected,” says Howard LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing. False positives are worrisome spots on a CT scan that are not cancer. But they usually require additional testing, perhaps a biopsy and even surgery for something that was harmless.

Before scheduling a low-dose CT lung screening, you’ll need to talk to a health professional about the screening process, your risks, whether it will be covered by your health insurance. Previously, an in-person medical appointment was required.

Why did the ACS change the years-since-quitting screening requirement?

Much international research suggests that the number of years since someone stopped smoking has little or no bearing on their risk of developing lung cancer, says Dr. Thomson.

“You have an equal likelihood of developing lung cancer whether you quit more than 15 years ago or more recently,” she says. “The recommendations on the national scene say that we need to be screening more people and make it easier to be screened. One of the ways to do that is to drop the quit history requirement.”

If you’re eligible for screening, how often should you have it?

Every year, says the ACS.

But why not screen for lung cancer for several years and then take a break, as is done with a malignancy such as cervical cancer? Research hasn’t been done to demonstrate that this type of approach is safe, Dr. Thomson says.

“We know that a large percentage of lung cancers identified in people through low-dose CT scans are identified after their first year of screening,” she says. “And some forms of lung cancer can move quickly, which is part of the reason it’s as deadly as it is.”

Did all guidelines organizations drop the years-since-quitting requirement?

No. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force — which, along with the ACS and other groups, recommend national standards for screenings — haven’t yet signed on to the ACS approach. These two groups maintain that only smokers who quit 15 or fewer years ago should remain eligible for screening.

However, guidelines issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network mesh with the new ACS recommendations by not having a years-since-quitting threshold.

Because Medicare and other health insurers may have slightly different rules to determine payment for lung cancer CT screening, it’s best to confirm this with your health care provider or insurer before getting tested.

About the Author

Maureen Salamon, Executive Editor, Harvard Women's Health Watch

Maureen Salamon is executive editor of Harvard Women’s Health Watch. She began her career as a newspaper reporter and later covered health and medicine for a wide variety of websites, magazines, and hospitals. Her work has … See Full Bio View all posts by Maureen Salamon

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD

Shining light on night blindness

Animals renowned for their outstanding night vision include owls, cats, tarsiers (a tiny primate in Southeast Asia) — and even the dung beetle.

But humans? Not so much.

Over time, many people suffer from night blindness, also known as nyctalopia. This condition makes seeing in dim or dark settings difficult because your eyes cannot adjust to changes in brightness or detect light.

What are the dangers for those experiencing night blindness?

Night blindness is especially problematic and dangerous when driving. Your eyes cannot adjust between darkness and the headlights of oncoming vehicles, other cars may appear out of focus, and your depth perception becomes impaired, which makes it difficult to judge distances.

Night blindness also may affect your sight at home by making it hard for your vision to quickly adjust to a dark room after turning off the lights. “This can cause people to bump into furniture or trip and suffer an injury,” says Dr. Isabel Deakins, an optometrist with Harvard-affiliated Massachusetts Eye and Ear.

What happens in the eye to create night blindness?

The ability to see in low-light conditions involves two structures in the eye: the retina and the iris.

The retina, located in the back of the eye, contains two types of light-detecting cells called cones and rods. The cones handle color vision and fine details while the rods manage vision in dim light.

The iris is the colored part of your eye. It contains muscles that widen or narrow the opening of your pupil to adjust how much light can enter your eyes.

If your irises don’t properly react, the pupils can dilate and let in too much light, which causes light sensitivity and makes it hard to see in bright light. Or your pupils may remain too small and not allow in enough light, making it tough to see in low light.

What causes night blindness?

Night blindness is not a disease but a symptom of other conditions. “It’s like having a bruise on your body. Something else causes it,” says Dr. Deakins.

Several conditions can cause night blindness. For instance, medications, such as antidepressants, antihistamines, and antipsychotics, can affect pupil size and how much light enters the eye.

Eye conditions that can cause night blindness include:

• glaucoma, a disease that damages the eye’s optic nerves and blood vessels
• cataracts, cloudy areas in the lens that distort or block the passage of light through the lens
• dry eye syndrome.

However, one issue that raises the risk of night blindness that you can’t control is age. “Our eyes react more slowly to light changes as we age, and vision naturally declines over time,” says Dr. Deakins.  “The number of rods in our eyes diminish, pupils get smaller, and the muscles of the irises weaken.”

What helps if you have night blindness?

If you notice any signs of night blindness, avoid driving and get checked by an eye care specialist like an optometrist or ophthalmologist. An eye exam can determine if your eyeglass prescription needs to be updated.

“Often, a prescription change is enough to reduce glare when driving at night," says Dr. Deakins. “You may even need separate glasses with a stronger eye prescription that you wear only when driving at night.”

Adding an anti-reflective coating to your lens may help to cut down on the glare of the headlights of an oncoming car. However, skip the over-the-counter polarized driving glasses sold at many drug stores. "These may help cut down on glare, but they don't address the causes of night blindness," says Dr. Deakins.

An eye exam also will identify glaucoma or cataracts, which can be treated. Glaucoma treatments include eyedrops, laser treatment, or surgery. Cataracts are corrected with surgery to replace the clouded lens with an artificial one. Your eye care specialist can also help identify dry eye and recommend treatment.

Ask your primary care clinician or a pharmacist if any medications that you take may cause night blindness. If so, it may be possible to adjust the dose or switch to another drug.

Three more ways to make night driving safer

You also can take steps to make night driving safer. For example:

• Wash the lenses of your glasses regularly. And take them to an optician to buff out minor scratches.
• Keep both sides of your front and rear car windshields clean so that you can see as clearly as possible.
• Dim your dashboard lights, which cause glare, and use the night setting on your rearview mirror.

About the Author

Matthew Solan, Executive Editor, Harvard Men's Health Watch

Matthew Solan is the executive editor of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. He previously served as executive editor for UCLA Health’s Healthy Years and as a contributor to Duke Medicine’s Health News and Weill Cornell Medical College’s … See Full Bio View all posts by Matthew Solan

About the Reviewer

Howard E. LeWine, MD, Chief Medical Editor, Harvard Health Publishing

Dr. Howard LeWine is a practicing internist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Chief Medical Editor at Harvard Health Publishing, and editor in chief of Harvard Men’s Health Watch. See Full Bio View all posts by Howard E. LeWine, MD